Latest Unreported Judgements
- ARJUN SINGH SAHI VS DCIT/ACIT CENTRE CIRCLE (ITAT DEHRADUN)
- Vishva Kalyan Foundation vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- N K Gems v. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Nandkshore Telefilms & Media Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (ITA No. 2563/Mum/2025) (ITAT Mumbai)
- Amish Anantrai Modi vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Sanjana Sanjay Arora vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Amish Anantrai Modi v. DCIT (ITA No.6282/Mum/2025) (ITAT Mumbai)
- DCIT vs. Relcon Infraprojects Ltd. (ITA Nos. 7064–7070/Mum/2025) {ITAT Mumbai)
- Amit Jatia v. ACIT & Smita Jatia (Smt.) v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Catholic Education Society v. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Latest Articles
- An Analysis of Direct Tax Proposals and GST 2026-2027
- India’s Union Budget 2026-27
- The Direct Tax Code(DTC) 2025: Overall analysis and Key Changes
- Budget 2026: Why Income Tax Amendments Will Be Made in the 2025 Act Instead of the Repealed 1961 Law
- Final Order beyond Limitation Period: Approach of ITAT to Section 153(4) read with Sections 143(3), 144C and 144B
- Section 80P(2)(d): Deduction of Interest on Statutory Investments with Cooperative Banks – An In-depth Legal Analysis
- Right-Angled Input Tax Credit (ITC) Claim: How to Avoid GST Departmental Assessments, Mismatch Notices & Penalties.
- Law of evidence vis-a-vis the CGST Act, 2017
- Artificial Intelligence – Boom Or Bubble
- Whether Section 115BAA Override LTCG Concessional Rate
Latest Judgements in Digest
- OArun Mammen v .DCIT (Inv) (2025) 344 CTR 398 / 248 DTR 481/ 171 taxmann.com 570 (Mad)(HC) Kandathil M. Mammem v .DCIT (Inv) (2025) 344 CTR 398 / 248 DTR 481/ 171 taxmann.com 570 (Mad)(HC) n writ court held that proceedings under the Black Money Act are intended to be directed against persons who failed to disclose foreign assets or file returns under the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the present case, the assessees had admittedly filed their return of income on 21.05.2015, i.e., prior to the coming into force of the Black Money Act w.e.f. 01.07.2015. Further, the assessees had approached the Settlement Commission and the dispute for AYs 2005-06 to 2011-12 stood settled under Chapter XIX-A of the Act. The Court noted CBDT Circular No. 12 of 2015 dated 02.07.2015 granting a one-time compliance opportunity and reiterated that the enactment of the Black Money Act did not bar settlement proceedings. Once the dispute was settled, continuance of proceedings under notices issued u/s 10(1) of the Black Money Act could not be countenanced and was liable to be quashed. (AY. 2005-06 to 2011-12)(SJ )
- United Capital Partners India (P) Ltd. v PCIT (2025) 344 CTR 192 / 248 DTR 280( SJ) (Mad)(HC)
- TVL Sanmac Motor Finance Ltd. v. CBDT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 577 / (2025) 344 CTR 869 (Mad)(HC)
- Vibhavari Bharat Bhatt v. ITO (Intl.) (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org
- JM Financial Foundation v. ITO (Ex) ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org
- Amit Jatia v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org Smita Jatia (Smt ) v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org
- Catholic Education Society v. CIT (E)( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline.org .
- Swami Shanti Prakash Ashram Trust v. ACIT (E), (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org .
- Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar (Mrs.) v. ACIT [2024] 163 taxmann.com 335 (Bom.) (HC)
- Gautam Dinesh Radia v. UOI [2024] 159 taxmann.com 676 (Bom.) (HC)
Latest Constitution Of ITAT Benches And Cause Lists
This is the scanned version of the printed Board, signed by the Assistant Registrar, and so it is as reliable as it can get.ITAT Bar Association, C/o Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Old CGO Building, 4th Floor, Room No. 445 (Library), Maharashi Karve Road, Mumbai 400 020. Tel: (022) 2205 5138, Fax: (022) 2203 6119, E Mail: itatonline.manager@gmail.com Office Bearers for the term 2025-26: President: Adv. K. Gopal Vice – Presidents: Adv. Nitesh Joshi & Adv. Ajay R. Singh Honorary Secretaries: Adv. Paras S. Savla & Adv. Rahul K. Hakani Honorary Treasurer: CA Anil J. Sathe Advisors: Shri. Y. P. Trivedi, Shri. S. E. Dastur & Dr. K. Shivaram Credit: We thank AIFTP for generously allowing us to host a lot of their research material.
Recent Comments